瑞士军刀男

电影《瑞士军刀男》的两位导演原本是业内知名的MV导演，因为一个有趣的小故事，才萌发了拍摄一部长片的想法，最终得到这部奇怪的电影。

所以，无论是从剧情还是对白，以及笑点来说，《瑞士军刀男》都是一部足够奇怪的电影。

首先，最奇怪的当然是这个让人一头雾水的名字。

根据大多数人的阅读习惯，大概会把片名断句为“瑞士，军刀男”，意指一个来自瑞士带着军刀的男人。

但看了电影，才真正明白片名的含义——一个像瑞士军刀一般有着无数功能的男人，准确来说是一具尸体。

这具尸体除了无法自行移动之外，简直无所不能。

说话、思考都是雕虫小技，牙齿作夹子，头作锤子也是不在话下，更厉害的是身体当作移动饮水机，放屁当作喷射器，口腔当作机关枪，甚至连勃起的丁丁都可以作为回家的指南针。

这具尸体可谓是居家旅行、闯荡江湖之必备神器，抢购千万认准“哈利·波特”品牌。

因为在电影中出演这具尸体的演员正是以哈利·波特这一角色火遍全球的丹尼尔·雷德克里夫，所以观影过程中一直在想，如果真的流落孤岛，到底是这具瑞士军刀般的尸体好用还是带上一个会魔法的小哈利好用。

当然，从这部电影最后的结果看来，大概是这具尸体更管用吧。

因为尸体不仅仅有着瑞士军刀般各种各样实用的功能，还在开导人心、鼓励精神方面有着非凡的功能电影从孤身一人流落孤岛的汉克准备上吊自杀开始，却在临死之前遇到了这具尸体，并给他取名为曼尼。

最终汉克依靠着曼尼各种神奇功能的帮助，成功地逃离孤岛，穿越丛林，回到了人类的世界。

可事实的真相也就此被真正揭露。

原来，根本没有什么叫作曼尼像瑞士军刀一般的尸体，而汉克也从来没有流落孤岛。

汉克也不是真正的汉克，他的原名其实是曼尼。

电影中的所有故事都只是生活失败的他的幻想而已。

他本身是一个典型的失败者，一事无成，连自己的父亲都觉得他是一个智障。

每天坐公交车的他暗恋着同一班车上的一个女孩，却只敢偷偷拍照作为手机桌面，始终没有勇气前去搭讪。

所以他躲到了暗恋女孩房子后面的山林中，当起了一个与世隔绝的野人。

在这里，他用垃圾构筑了一个新的家园，甚至搭建出那辆经常偶遇女孩的公交车。

在这个过程中，这具尸体便是他幻想出来帮助自己的人。

可以说，这正是同一个他的两面性。

一面是无能怯懦的他本身，另一面却是无所不能又无知无畏的“瑞士军刀尸体”。

所以他们两个人一直在聊天，聊天的话题从生活本身到爱情与性，无所不含，但其对话的目的终究还是让失败的曼尼找回继续生活的自信，可以再次回到社会。

当然，这一目的在电影的最后也算达成了。

至少他的父亲微笑着看着他，似乎理解了他的世界。

但是那个被暗恋的女孩以及世界的其他人似乎依旧是一脸“What the fuck”的表情。

不过这一切对于主角曼尼来说，都已经不重要了，他已经完成了自己与自己、自己与世界的和解。

这是一部非常有新意，但是缺点也非常明显的电影。

电影最有趣的设定当属这具像瑞士军刀般无所不能的尸体，尤其是各种功能的实现真的是脑洞大开，让人眼前一亮。

除此之外对话中的屁屎尿以及各种各样的荤段子也算笑点之一。

但是正如前文所说，电影来源于一个有趣的小故事，但最终被硬生生地拍成一部时长一个半小时地电影。

所以在很多地方显得有些拖沓冗长，部分情节也有些强行说教人生道理而显得无聊。

而这些所谓的人生道理无非是生活颓废、一事无成之时，自己改如何接受自己，别人又该如何不歧视自己，社会又该如何接纳自己。

电影试图在哲学范畴上更好地表达这些内容，但终究还是因为糟糕的剧本和叙事能力变得像老太婆的裹脚布一般，又臭又长。

总体而言，生活艰难，有这么一部充满屁屎尿、能够让人笑到前仰后翻的电影倒也不错。

不用深究电影究竟讲了什么，或者有没有成功表达什么，只要让人发笑了，那就不枉这看电影的一个半小时。

by Matt Mulcahey 原文：http://filmmakermagazine.com/99076-fart-to-the-heart-larkin-seiple-on-swiss-army-man/#.V_UGi_l96Hs

Larkin SeipleFilmmaker: How did you meet Swiss Army Man co-directors Dan Kwan and Daniel Scheinert (aka “Daniels”)?Seiple: We all studied at Emerson College in Boston but I didn’t really know them until after. I met Dan Scheinert because he was in a comedy troupe with one of my roommates. After college [the Daniels] made their first music video and I saw it at a small festival put on by other music video directors called “Videomacher” in Los Angeles. The majority of the videos screened were these big budget “professional” projects and Daniels had made their video for literally no money with a 7D and it just blew everyone else’s video out of the water. I tracked down Scheinert after the screening and gushed about how their video had blown my mind and it made all of the other work feel stale. I had completely forgotten we were surrounded by other directors and very loudly said something like, “You guys destroyed it. Everything else here is crap.” And he was like, “Shhhh.” (laughs) I told them that I wanted to work with them and then they called me to do [Foster the People’s Grammy-nominated music video] “Houdini.”Filmmaker: At what point did you first hear about Swiss Army Man and how did the idea evolve before you started shooting?Seiple: I got involved about a year before [we shot it]. The Daniels were constantly revising the script. It was a very zany script and some of the ideas [from earlier drafts] were even crazier [than what’s in the final film], things like laser eyes and an endless rope made of hair. They kept trying to find this balance between touching and bizarrely comedic, a story you could laugh at but also have it resonate with you. I think they distilled the idea to “a fart to the heart”.Filmmaker: Did anything get cut because of budget or was everything cut for story?Seiple: It was all for story. They would have a great idea that was really fun, but then they would realize that it completely took away from the story or it killed the rhythm so they would scrap it.Filmmaker: Where did you end up shooting?Seiple: We quickly discovered that southern California does not have beautiful forests and no real underbrush that makes forests lush and majestic. We ended up going to northern California, which has one of the most beautiful forests in the world. There’s a place in Eureka in the Redwoods called The Avenue of the Giants that is just stunning. These trees are so huge that you feel like you’re surrounded by ancient ancestors. It’s very quiet too. It reminded me of how the forests feel in Princess Mononoke. There’s just naturally a sense of magic to it.Filmmaker: How about the beach location for the opening scene?Seiple: That beach was also in Eureka. The project was actually shot in three different cities, which made it very challenging. We shot a lot of the bus sequence and a lot of the technical builds in the woods in a small forest outside of San Francisco that matched the redwoods in Eureka. Then we shot in Los Angeles for two weeks — everything in the water tank was shot there, we shot the opening fart scene of [Manny, played by Radcliffe] shooting across the water, and we shot the bear scene because it’s the only place you can get a bear. We also shot all the cave work [in LA]. The cave is actually the cave they used for the Batman TV show, where the Batmobile drives out. So we started in San Francisco, came back to Los Angeles, and then we ended in Eureka with a small crew going to get all of these wonderful moments in the most beautiful forest we could find.Filmmaker: How long was the shoot?Seiple: I think we had 25 days, but we had travel days on top of that. Then we got an extra day to do pick-ups on the very last day of the shoot. That was just me and the directors. Scheinert is the same exact build as Paul Dano so we just kept [Dano’s] wardrobe and shot a lot of the travelogue shots [with Scheinert doubling him], all these beautiful vistas of Scheinert walking around with the dummy.Filmmaker: Are any of the wide shots of Manny and Hank (Dano) crossing that ravine on the giant pipe actually Scheinert and the dummy or is that a VFX composite?Seiple: No, that shot is fake. We were scouting for hours east of Eureka trying to find a place to shoot that [practically]. We didn’t find one but we found a perfect location for our plates. However it was five hours from any major city and we knew we could never come back. Luckily we brought a Red Epic camera so we were able to capture plates for the ten or so angles we needed for the sequence.That pipe sequence was actually shot with several different pieces put together. There’s the shots of them getting onto the pipe, for which we built a fake pipe into a ditch near the side of a road. For the profile angles we broke down and rebuilt the pipe on a ridge so that our background felt high up and far away. Lastly, when they’re hanging off the pipe and for the falling plates, we had to bring in a crane and suspend them and shoot that [against] greenscreen.Filmmaker: You shot the film in July of last year. How did you get it ready for Sundance the following January? That’s incredibly short turnaround.Seiple: Oh yeah, it was nuts. We had an on-set editor, which helped us just emotionally to be able to come back in every day and have a scene from a week ago to look at and see that it was working or if we needed to do pickups. Once we wrapped, Daniels and their editor didn’t stop [working] until Sundance. It was crazy. I think Dan Scheinert was doing VFX comps on Christmas Day.Filmmaker: Did you have a DIT coloring dailies for the on-set editor?Seiple: We did. I had my DIT Matt Conrad, who has done the last three movies with me and for the most part all my commercials and music videos. He built a LUT that we would tweak per scene. For example in the forest there’s all this green bounce everywhere so you’re constantly trying to neutralize that so people’s [skin tones] don’t look like an alien’s. Or if we were cheating a scene for dawn we would warm the highlights and add a bit of magenta. We were able to apply the LUT to our dailies so as they edited they could discern what images worked.Filmmaker: Did you go back and tweak the color grade any more after Sundance?Seiple: We did, but it’s pretty close [to what screened at Sundance]. We went back and tweaked some of the crazier sequences, like some of the night work was really tricky to keep the continuity with a bear and a fireball and all of these visual effects shots. We also added a level of grain to the final version that wasn’t at Sundance to fight the digital look of it. It came off very sharp at the first screening and we just wanted to find a way to soften it a little bit more.Filmmaker: You used Cooke Anamorphics with the Alexa XT?Seiple: Yeah. The Cookes are a really lovely set of lenses. At a T4 or a 5.6 they’re pristine and very sharp, but if you shoot them around a T2.8 they start to have all these little inconsistencies that look really lovely on camera. The 75mm goes really soft on the top and bottom when you shoot wide open, which helped enhance some of the more subjective close ups.

Filmmaker: I read an interview where Daniels talked about the very different processes of Radcliffe and Dano. How do you take into account actors with different working methods when you’re planning the order of your coverage?Seiple: If it was a different movie I’d have a great answer for you, but for this movie we were hustling and moving very fast so those choices came down to “this is the shot that makes the most sense to do next and we’ve only got three takes to do it.” It was very easy to shoot Daniel as he’s always static, but Paul really likes to be in the moment and just let it happen. That’s challenging, because he jumps and moves and darts around a lot and as a camera operator you’re just like, “Alright, he’s still. Nope! He’s over here now.” In one of the opening shots of the film when Paul first hears the fart and he snaps up, you can see in the movie that the camera was not ready for him to pop up and so the camera does a slow drift up to catch up to him. I begged Daniels, “Just give me one more,” but they loved it.Filmmaker: Walk me through the fake Mannys. Did each have a specific function?Seiple: We had a small brigade of Mannys. One was stunt Manny, where the face work wasn’t as precise but he was about the weight of a human being so we could throw him around realistically. One was a much lighter Manny that I think had the best face work and we would use that for things like the scene where the raccoon [chews on Manny’s face]. There’s one take that they took out that I wish they would’ve kept where the raccoon goes right for Manny’s eyelid and pulls it open and it was terrifying. (laughs) That Manny was also super lightweight so Paul wouldn’t mess his back up by carrying around 150 pounds of weight every day. And then there was the floating Manny that we built a small air tube into so that it could consistently fart and float in the water. The floating dummy was a little tricky because we had to have multiple people on strings pulling him at the same time you had a guy running with an air tank so the dummy could emit farts.But ultimately we used Daniel Radcliffe more than anything else. Paul does carry Daniel quite a bit. When a scene wasn’t working with the dummy, we’d say, “Alright, let’s just do it with Daniel.” Daniel was also really insistent on trying to be in every shot he could to support Paul. We ultimately only used the dummy for things that a human shouldn’t do.Filmmaker: Did the AD supply your on-set fart noises?Seiple: Actually either Kwan or Scheinert would do it when we were shooting because the farts had to be very specific. They all have a different emotion to them. I don’t know if the video made it [online], but when Manny first starts farting on the beach Scheinert was conducting him off camera, literally like a symphony of farts. Scheinert would raise his arms and bring them down and raise them again and then simmer it down. It was a pretty interesting sight to behold.Filmmaker: Tell me about the set-up for the opening title card shot – which is a super wide shot of Hank riding Manny like a fart-propelled jet ski. Both the actors and the camera are moving at a pretty good clip.Seiple: That whole sequence, like everything else, was pieced together. All of the shots of Paul and Radcliffe were done with them on a giant boogie board dragging them through the Pacific Ocean with some gnarly waves. They could at any moment get tossed off, which is a little intimidating if you don’t like swimming in the middle of the ocean. So we shot all of their close-up work like that and then we had a stuntman dressed in Paul’s gear and we put the dummy on a very small knee board and the stuntman would climb on and we would get like 10 seconds of footage before he got knocked off by a wave.Filmmaker: So the stuntman was being pulled by some type of boat?Seiple: Yeah, I think it was a motorboat pulling them and then in post we removed the wake and the foam caused by it. The camera was on a zoom lens tracking with them at high speed on a flat-bottom boat. That scene was bananas to shoot and shooting in the ocean is very frustrating. Everything is always drifting or changing with the current so we figured the best solution was to shoot on a zoom, on a crane, with a remote head so we could literally swing the camera anywhere we had to. We barely got all the shots. We grabbed the last one at dusk and there was a very beautiful sunset but it lit the water with oranges and pinks so in post we had to color grade the crap out of it and force blue back into the water. That was a very challenging scene to shoot/grade because it goes from hard sunlight to soft sunlight to sunset and we had to make that all feel like it takes place at the same time. Luckily we had Sofie Borup color grade the film and she did a wonderful job.Filmmaker: Do you have any horror stories about the bear or the raccoons?Seiple: The raccoons were good. I believe their names were Boris and Natasha. Raccoons can really only either grab something or run away and each of the raccoons had a specific move that it could do. So they weren’t too bad, we just had to do a lot of takes and they were constantly trying to escape, which made the owners nervous because we were in a giant forest.The bear was challenging to shoot in that we didn’t have a lot of time with it. We had to set up an electric fence around the bear wherever we were shooting just in case something went wrong, which is nerve-wracking to shoot any sequence where you’re surrounded by an electric fence for your protection. The owners also seemed a little intimidated by the bear. (laughs) They looked very nervous when he wasn’t in the cage. Its main lure was ice cream sandwiches. They would throw five or ten of them back into his cage whenever they finished a take. He loved them. The bear’s name was Tag and he was very sweet but you could hear him rolling around in the cage and you thought, “My god, how much does he weigh?” The suspension on the truck was just shaking.One tricky part was that he photographed much darker than we expected so we had to redo all of our lighting once we actually framed up on the bear. Our gaffer, Matt Ardine, had designed a wonderful lighting setup of moving lights on Condors and thank god they were all remote controlled. We were able to pan and tilt them remotely and increase the intensity, so once the bear came out we quickly re-lit the scene and over-lit the hell out of it just so we could see the bear. So when we shot the bear it looked like a high key comedy with super bright moonlight and a vibrant background and it was supposed to be a moody scene at night. In post we had to go in and basically bring down [the levels on] everything but the bear.Filmmaker: In addition to the Alexa you used the Phantom Flex 4K for a few sequences, including the shots where Manny and Hank burst out from underneath the water in slow motion.Seiple: That was a big moment in the movie for Daniels and they wanted it to be otherworldly so we decided to shoot it at a high frame rate to enhance that state of awe. That was half stuntmen and half real actors. The shot of them initially bursting out of the water is just Paul and Daniel (Radcliffe) in the shallow end of a pool jumping out of the water from underneath, which looked great. Then for the wide shot we built a system of trusses over the pool and had high-speed cable rigged to two stuntmen underwater. On action the motor would go and it would rip these guys upwards out of the water. We shot that against greenscreen and combined it with the plates we shot four months earlier on that scout.Filmmaker: What frame rate did you end up shooting at?Seiple: I think it was 1,000 [frames per second]. At that speed you get a 4K image. If you shoot 2,000 frames per second you get a 2K image. We went for the higher resolution because we knew that we had to cut it out of the greenscreen and we needed all the resolution we could get.Filmmaker: Did you have to pump a lot of light onto the actors to expose for a frame rate that high?Seiple: We had plenty of light. The tricky part was matching it to those plates we’d already shot. When we shot the plates it was sunny but partly cloudy so it’s direct light but soft. To match that light we shaded the pool in a 20’x20’ of Full Grid rigged off a Condor to soften the sunlight. Then to give them a subtle edge we spotted in two M90s just off camera.

Filmmaker: There’s some behind the scenes footage out there that shows how you shot the sequence in which Radcliffe – propelled skyward by an ignited fart – falls back down to earth through a series of tree branches. In the footage you see a Red Epic rigged to a Doggy Cam and crew members whacking Radcliffe with branches.Seiple: The choice that we made to make it a body mount POV shot of Manny falling through the trees was really done because we didn’t know how to shoot it any other way. We created a moving light rig around Radcliffe using LED tubes to make it as though the moonlight is circling him as he falls. It wasn’t actually a Doggy Cam mount. It was some funky mount rig my key grip Nick Kirsten had found. We couldn’t afford Doggy Cam.Filmmaker: Did you use the Epic for that just because it’s smaller and lighter?Seiple: Yeah, we did it for the weight. The Alexa Mini either wasn’t out yet or we couldn’t get our hands on it, I don’t remember which. And the (higher) resolution (of the Epic compared to the Alexa) helped a little bit too so that in post they could zoom in or reframe a little bit. But mainly it was because we didn’t want to put all this weight on Daniel Radcliffe while he was also being hit by branches.

预告片让人眼前一亮，感觉是非常新颖的题材。

正片延续了这种新颖感，但是炫酷的脑洞之下，这又是一个关于自我，关于孤独，关于爱的故事...男主角还是《阳光小美女》里面的样子，似乎文艺片都偏爱这样阴郁的少年，所以这当然也是一个少年（青年）的故事咯。

故事的设定依然是一个郁郁不得志的普通男子，漂到孤岛，然后与求生中寻找自我。

像不像《鲁宾逊漂流记》？

只是一具尸体代替了一个球。

我是不相信尸体是会复活和开口说话的，我猜导演也不是想拍一部鬼片。

那说话的到底是谁？

这个像瑞士军刀一样十八般武艺样样精通的“尸体”到底代表着什么？

之前看见过一种说法是男主角上吊的时候其实已经死了，后面都是他濒死的幻觉。

港片《僵尸》就用了这样的方式。

但是这部电影给我们的结局却是煞有其事的，以至于跟我一起观影的朋友一直想不通这部电影到底在说什么。

然而我觉得，尸体是否复活并不是重点啊，美国又没有广电总局，为什么非要给你一个结果？

所以过程才是这部电影的重点，以及一切。

电影的女主角暂且确定为手机里的那一位，然而她却只是一个符号。

一个梦中情人，一个陌生人，一个可触不可及的象征。

尽管男主角和“尸体”上演了一幕幕初恋偶遇般的情节，这个女人早就升华到了一个垫脚石的作用。

是否有勇气跟她说话，是否放下对她的执念，或者是否确定真的爱她？

到了最后，男主角似乎都放下了。

但是他却放不下那具“尸体”啊。

为什么？

因为“尸体”就是他的自我投射，换言之，是他创造的“新的自我”。

这个和他品味一样，同甘共苦，解救他于危难之中的好朋友。

拜托，他真的只是一具尸体而已，又不是超人。

所以，以心理学的角度来解释这部电影，更像是男主角把信心和希望寄托在某一个物体——尸体上，然后他爆发了自己的能量带着他跋山涉水把家还。

孤独是会产生幻觉的，人类求生的欲望远远超出自己的想象。

似乎我又想到《少年派》，但是这个故事温柔可爱的多。

结尾“尸体”发动了他“放气”的技能又把自己投进了大海，朝着男主角开心笑着。

我觉得还是算很完整的交代，毕竟不能让男主角上升到恋尸癖的程度。

因为这终究是说少年成长的故事，又不是恐怖片。

P.S. 这部电影显然是属于小众的，但是也不乏让大众插科打诨的笑料。

与我同场的观众，既有胡子拉碴的胖大叔，也有组队来看的纹身青年，还有优雅得体的中年夫妇。

但是就是没有穿格子衬衫瘦弱斯文的男生啊！

这部电影明明就是属于他们的！

朋友（男）看完直说：“这说的是什么？！

一点都不好看，神经病才觉得好看！

” 嗯, 他一个普通青年，从来没有关于自我的困境，还能指望他看出个什么花来（翻白眼）。

【这很重要吗？

不，这不重要。

】

《瑞士军刀男》在太平洋的一座孤岛之上，一位名叫汉克的青年看尽云卷云舒，潮起潮落。

自他流落孤岛起，已不知过去了多少时日，在近乎无限的无聊时光里，他感受海浪的抚摸，回望自己的生活，却发现自己一直像奴隶一样过活。

他看着眼前那黄色的海滩与地平线相接，找来了一根绳子，打算就此了解自己的人生，直到他挂上去的那一刻，他猛然看见沙滩上有一具身着西装的人影。

囚困于孤独之中的汉克本想近距离观瞧，但粗粝的绳子已然扼住了他的咽喉，他拼命的挣扎，最终将绳子挣断，在他在大口嗅吸着清新的空气的同时，跌跌撞撞地迈向那具人影，但最终他见到的只有冰冷的尸体。

那是具不断放屁的尸体，一开始，汉克还相信着科学，他深知那是尸体内不断乱窜的细菌所释放的气体，但孤独良久的他不由自主的放弃了科学精神，他认为这次相遇即是天意。

他借助尸体的屁，将他当做摩托艇，驾驶着他远渡大洋，回到了陆地。

为了感谢尸体帮助他回到陆地，汉克打算带着他一起寻找救援，起码那帮助他回归亲人的回报，不至于在不知名的地点腐烂生蛆。

但很快他就意识到了自己的错误，在孤岛之上，他就缺少水与食物，他的体力没怎么空余到可以辅助他驼起尸体，虽然他没走多久就发现了人类随意丢弃的垃圾，但是这地方是个密林，与其在这里等待救援还不如动身前行，背负尸体肯定让他步步维艰。

在艰难前行后，汉克找到了一个山洞，他和尸体分别睡在山洞的里外，此时下了大雨，但哪怕他快速的制造了一个过滤装置，也只能在大雨里喝到寸许净水，直到他发现尸体可以存储水，他便疯狂的汲取尸体中的净水饮用。

直到此时，那具已经确认死亡的尸体突然开始说话，他除了眼睛和嘴巴以外没有任何地方可以动弹，就像一个高位截瘫的人在挣扎，他自称自己叫做曼尼。

汉克已经无法分清事情的真相，他知道自己疯了，但是却宁愿深入这疯狂的幻觉，他开始和曼尼交谈，曼尼失忆了，就像一个天真的孩童，对于任何事物都有近乎无限的好奇，他能很快地理解汉克说的一切，并以汉克不喜欢的形式说出来。

难耐孤独的汉克决定带着曼尼一起上路，他们在途中不停的畅谈，渐渐地，汉克发现曼尼就像一把瑞士军刀一样万用，可以储存净水、可以用手指摩擦生火、可以用喉咙将石头变成子弹发射、可以用牙齿给他刮胡子、甚至，他可以用充血翘起的海绵体指路。

他的万能让汉克不再艰难，他的陪伴也让这困苦的状况有了一丝慰藉，但这寸许微光始终也无法淡化汉克长久以来的心理障碍。

他恐惧正常的社会，拒绝正常的社会，只有这森林才能成为他的归宿，他见证过汽车在他面前行驶，但他放弃出声叫喊，因为他在犹豫，他在困惑，他无法离开这森林和曼尼。

曼尼的存在是一种超现实的答卷，汉克清楚地知道这一切不是真的，但他愿意投身其中，因为那些看似被人们厌恶的事情却被曼尼做了出来，那是他做不到的事，他无法当众放屁、无法搭讪、无法对着刚见面的女孩说我想上你，曼尼打破了世俗的常规，寸寸勇气被曼尼强行赋予了汉克。

汉克其实随时带着手机，哪怕没有信号也没有多少电，但他仍旧会不时的开机，看看锁屏上的那个不认识他的女性，那是他暗恋的对象，也是他的梦魇。

但因屁而开的旅途也因屁而争执，曼尼的世俗常规是超然的，他可以公然放屁，但汉克却无法做到，他害怕人们的眼光。

最终因为熊的袭击，汉克近乎瘫痪，但从来无法动弹的曼尼却为了救汉克而浑身沾染烈焰不停的爬行，最终吓退了熊。

二人的身份也就此转换，汉克被曼尼背着前进，直到回归了文明社会，曼尼死去了，而汉克第一个遇见的人是梦中情人的女儿。

很快梦中情人也来到了他的面前，但正如他所料，对方并不认识他，但还是为他报了警。

当警察赶到，汉克看着被装进裹尸袋的曼尼五味杂陈，身后传来的是父亲急切的呼喊，最终汉克下定决心，当着所有人的面掳走了曼尼，他带着曼尼来到海边，在他的耳边倾诉衷肠，然后在众人面前发出了响亮的屁，并且毫不犹豫地承认是自己所为，此刻的他仿佛和曼尼合二为一。

但汉克仍旧在不停呼喊着曼尼复苏，他不在乎自己会被怎么对待，他只希望曼尼能够离开，然后回归大海，前往下一个需要他的人的所在。

最终，在众目睽睽之下，第二次死去的曼尼再次复苏，屁声响彻云霄，他再次化身摩托艇，借助屁的动力在海上一骑绝尘。

这个由屁开始的故事也由屁而终。

【END】

接下来是我的看法这是一部很奇特的悲喜剧，屎尿屁在众多喜剧的表演手法里都是一些比较低俗却也特别万用的东西，但用多了难免会显得审美疲劳，但《瑞士军刀男》并不一样。

它由屁而启，又以屁终，中途也在不停的穿插屁的身影和利用屁点火和引发矛盾冲突的导火索，十足的黑色幽默确实让电影有一番不同的意味，但是过于无节操的荒诞情节与黑色幽默，让整部电影的外在形式大于实际内容，从写实主义转变为无厘头的超现实主义，这里面的转变是非常快的，而如此快速的转变也让我有了三个不同的想法。

想法一在电影中，汉克怎么流落荒岛其实并没有交代清楚过，那么结合他和曼尼的冒险过程和以及电影结尾的放屁，可以猜测实际上汉克从始至终都没有流落过荒岛，他只是一个自小失去母亲、被父亲念为智障、没有朋友、没有生存意义的想要自杀的可怜人。

他最终臆想出了一具不存在的尸体和看见尸体会有所反应的众人，借助这种臆想来寻找回自我的价值，来佐证自己的存在。

最后鼓动曼尼离开，也是证明自己的心已经彻底不在乎这些过去的阴云了。

想法二流落荒岛不是真实的，但遇见曼尼是真实的，曼尼真的只是一具尸体。

他无法行动、无法储存干净水、无法帮助汉克赶走熊，他的语言是汉克的投影，不是真实的自我，而是臆想的自我，他们只是一起生活在汉克梦中情人的房子后面不远处。

电影里的汉克是个拥有极强动手能力却对于现实社会不断逃避的人，曼尼如同瑞士军刀一般的全能性，是他心目中的自己，他人眼中的自己，他希望自己是个不被社会以及人们的眼光所困囚的人，于是利用曼尼来封闭自我，实际上那所有的旅途都是他自己做到的。

而曼尼也不过是个跳桥自杀的人。

最终汉克将曼尼的尸体放逐，发现真正的自我，接受真正的懦弱，哪怕有那丑陋或是自己认为不堪的一面，也能归回勇气的彼岸。

想法三汉克真的流落了荒岛，曼尼也是真的死了但没完全死，而汉克也真的是因为万能的曼尼而回到了文明社会并且找到了勇气，整部电影就是一部超现实主义的电影。

曼尼的存在是一种意向，他是为了对于世人的爱而存在，他是为了周围那所有迷失在狭间之地的灵魂而存在，他为那来自世界的每个角落的人而存在。

那些在身体即将被溺毙时发出诞生自灵魂的求救的人找到了曼尼，而曼尼也找到了他们。

汉克就是这样的人，他即将在物理和精神上被双重溺毙，而曼尼出现了，他轻而易举的赋予了汉克爱的意义，所以汉克爱上了他。

曼尼的存在把他拖出了如梦似幻的泡影，教会他，纵使马车的轮子无影无踪，也会要乘着它前往天空。

而最终汉克真的被拯救，曼尼也就不再需要留下来了，他需要去拯救更多像汉克一样的人，直到人人都可以敞开心扉，交换爱。

以上就是三种想法，我个人会偏向第三种，原因是我喜欢这种欣然接受一切爱，让恩怨隔阂统统消弭的展开，打开封闭的心，让曼尼为大家带来每个人都值得的爱，让大家清楚每一天都值得被爱，无论发生什么事情都可喜可贺。

这样才比较有趣。

这个故事，并不是什么生与死的互动，也并不是什么人尸之间的基情，这是一个屌丝在末路中选择自绝，但仍然被对人与人之间爱的渴望唤醒内心的自我，试图拯救自己以及接纳自己的故事。

故事究竟是喜剧还是悲剧？

结局描绘了两个场景：既有可能主角疯了，也有可能是确实存在神奇的manny并且hank得到了众人的相信。

而实际究竟是什么？

或许并不是主角真的疯了，也不是存在manny这个神奇的尸体。

而是没人爱的hank，选择了拯救自己，接纳自己，自己爱自己，却只能看着那个自我远，留下外在的已经癫狂的自己面对众人厌恶的目光。

能够得到安慰的或许是，那个自我再次回到了海上，自由地飘荡与飞翔。

似乎只要见到了那个具有能量的自己，其他人便能投来肯定的目光。

一个漂至荒岛失去生存希望的人用极其猥琐的嗓音哼着救赎之歌，准备上吊自杀，但海面上漂来一个哈利波特扮演的死人打断了他的自杀计划。

他在给死人做胸部按压急救时听见尸体放了个巨响的屁，此后屁接二连三连绵不绝，他便把尸体翻过来趴着浮在海面上，骑上去，利用尸体放屁提供动力，并将先前上吊用的绳子套在尸体的脖子上，用作调整方向兼控制尸体头部与水面仰角的缰绳，如此做成一只快艇，飞驰逃离荒岛。

快艇把他带到大陆。

不久他又发现尸体的其它功能，他能把尸体改装成自来水龙头提供淡水，或改成莲蓬头用来洗澡，能改装成斧子用来砍柴，改成发射石丸的枪来打猎，改成屁动力垂直升降飞行器、燃屁打火机，老二还能当指南针。

此片把人生的各种体验换一种更原始也更具想象力的方式在远离文明之地一一呈现，阐释出人生的本质是记忆，一切深刻而美好的体验都藏在无尽的回味中……直到最后一幕，本片仍在上演奇迹。

恶趣味的背后蕴藏着人生哲理，看得劳资如痴如醉，必须给五星。

【巧妙的软广】https://site.douban.com/215175/ （我的小站）

本来想说这部电影有两种分类可能，一种是剧情片，即男主角是废柴屌丝，很多细节都是自己幻想出来；另一种是奇幻片，即一切场景都是真实存在，男主角最后真的得到了别人认同。

但是，看了这么多一边倒的倾向于第一种类型的影评后，我突然想说，本片不是开放式结局。

原因很简单，第二种可能更符合对美好生活的向往。

倾向于第一种的大多是现实派，混迹社会多年，久经世间沧桑，除了人性阴暗面就是社会背景分析。

其实生活本应多一些单纯，多一些简简单单的真善美，而不需要事事都逻辑分析。

表面上一副洞察一切，看穿万事背后真理的样子，实际并没有太多的可能，事实就摆在眼前，仅此而已。

打个夸张的比方，别人夸你今天气色不错，你可以真心感觉气色好，也可以当他随口说，更可以想难道暗示我之前气色差？

在这里只想强调一点：加上结尾才把电影完全释放出来。

导演并不是想让大家自作主张的以为男主角是个废柴，恰恰相反，他不但希望肯定前面的所有故事和情感，更想证明男主角已经征服他爸他女神和所有人！

结尾才最最打动人啊，它让前面屎尿屁有了意义，不至于前面虽然恶心又感人但最后回味起来只剩恶心！

而且结尾把整片的孤独感推到了一个极致。

再次向上面的影评提示：本片不同于《禁闭岛》或者《盗梦空间》，它就是直讲直叙，并非开放式结局！！！

Swiss Army Man前半部分算是有趣但并不太出彩的荒诞片，相信大部分人和我一样以为整部影片就只是讲主角Hank靠着尸体Manny为精神寄托，乐观求生的励志故事。

然而最后几分钟却出现了让人叹服的大反转，揭露出一个残酷真相：Hank并没有迷失荒岛，他只是一个不能融入社会生活的废柴，整个故事都是他躲在暗恋女生家后山上的幻想。

所以我觉得这部电影大概是为了讨论这么一个问题：人更应该追求现实世界的成功还是内心世界的满足？

我常在街上看到酗酒嗑药到不能自理的人，他们衣衫褴褛举止怪异，但看起来面露满足和快乐。

我想大多人并不羡慕这种快乐，离这种人远远的并且在面对酒精和毒品时以他们为戒，提醒自己要理智自律地活着。

我虽坚信人生的终极目标是追求快乐而非生存繁衍这些程式化的任务，却也并没有选择像这些疯子一样放纵自己在另一个世界里沉沦。

人就是这么矛盾：我们一面告诫自己理性处事委曲求全，一面又羡慕洒脱歌颂自由；一面憧憬长安市上酒家眠的意境，一面嘲笑身边的每一个醉汉。

有时我也像这些醉汉一样沉湎于自己的精神世界，那一刻我清楚地知道别人眼里我就是一个疯子。

我也因此换位想到，每一个看上去的疯子都可能只是沉浸在我所不能理解的快乐之中而已。

而这部电影的厉害之处就在于，先把我们放在一个疯子的视角，跟着他一起疯，同时插入一些对人生哲理的思考来说服你，让你更深入地理解疯子，同意疯子。

当你已经不知不觉地和疯子站在一边的时候，再揭露他是个疯子的事实。

这个时候观众的反应也不难料想：清醒理性的观众会一脸WTF，气愤于导演的愚弄摔门而去。

而对作为半个疯子的我，这个真相就像是把我对人生预设的一种可能过了一遍一样，又怎么能不为之动容呢？

我想大多数人虽然同意幻觉可以支撑我们活下去，但都不赞成躲进精神世界里逃避现实。

这大概是出于两个原因：首先，我们还是有基本的生存需要。

过度沉浸在幻觉中可能影响我们生存的能力，所以大多数疯子虽然有短暂的快乐但最后还是死路一条。

我想本片中Hank一开选择自杀也是这个原因。

更可怕的是，我一直隐隐担心，其实精神上的享受也多半以物质享受为根基，缺少根基的精神享受可能难以稳定存在。

这一点影片诠释得非常好。

Manny这个角色大概就代表着Hank在物质方面欲望的投射。

因此Manny的举止带有一些Hank的本我的特点：比如在询问遇到女神怎么办的时候，Manny直接问的就是我可不可以吻她，可不可以跟她啪啪。

不难想象，Hank躲在女神家的后山上每天刷着女神的ins，虽然感情上是满足的，但一定也觉得缺少了点什么。

但为了压抑自己的原始冲动，这种欲望只能借看到女神照片就勃起的Manny宣泄出来。

Manny在最后也因此质问Hank，为什么我想干啥你都要拦着。

这根本就是超我对本我的调教嘛！

同样在现实生活中，很多阿宅也许都发过我有偶像我不需要谈恋爱的豪言壮语。

虽然这种虚拟的爱可以满足感情上的需要，但有些最原始的欲望却无法在偶像身上得到满足。

当然爱情这个话题太复杂，不深入讨论。

其次，人是社会的动物，且可以彼此精确交流。

所以构建自己的精神世界也需要他人配合。

你可以告诉自己我过得很快乐，也可以欺骗自己外人的鄙视其实都是妒忌，但他们怜悯目光会一直躲在你内心深处拷问你，最终成为让你整个精神世界崩塌的蛀虫。

这也是为什么Hank只能远离家人，选择自我流放的原因。

人为了在这个社会里和平相处，设立了各种条条框框，一方面确保了大家相安无事，一方面也成为了阻碍了我们尽情享受自己的精神世界的枷锁。

社会认同的需要决定了我们的精神满足感很大程度上被他人的目光所左右。

Manny问Hank，为什么我们不能尽情地放屁，为什么大家不放下一切的约束，一起高兴地唱歌跳舞就好了。

是啊我也想随时随地忘我地起舞，但在这无奈的社会里，我们只好收紧自己的屁，循规蹈矩地迈步。

在Manny的唆使下，Hank最终以一个逃生者的形象出现在Sarah家的草坪上。

显然，作为欲望化身的Manny不能继续存在，他的最后一句话是：别让Sarah知道我有多喜欢她。

这代表重回社会的Hank不得不为了他人的眼光约束起自己。

而Sarah发现真相之后，Hank已经不可避免地成为大家眼中的疯子。

为了捍卫自己的精神世界，他唯一能做的就是再次逃离人群与世隔绝。

结尾的情节则更可悲：当Hank走投无路被追到海边时，众目睽睽之下，Manny放着屁在海水里抽动起来仿佛活了一般。

众人惊诧的目光中，Hank再次绽放出快乐的笑容。

正如之前所说，构建自己的精神世界需要他人的配合。

当真相大白天下后，Hank无法继续自己一个人坚信这段虚构的旅途以及从中获得快乐，所以他需要这样一个证据让他人也相信Manny的存在。

不难猜测，这一幕应该也只是Hank的幻想。

当我们一开始从一个荒岛逃生者的视角看Hank，就觉得他幻想出关于Manny的一切，苦中取乐，这种求生的信念值得称道。

但当我们发现他其实只是个躲在别人后山上逃避现实的疯子，有些人就会觉得真是恶心。

殊不知对很多人来说，在这个社会里好好地生存，可能并不比荒岛求生容易呢。

正因为快乐地活着是如此不易，我们需要的幻想可能比我们以为的要更多一点。

于是，我们躲进自己的精神世界里，或多或少地都成了“疯子”：被坏人欺负就幻想恶有恶报；付出没回报就念想有志者事竟成；看别人挥金如土，就劝自己知足常乐；没法跟喜欢的人在一起，就觉得单恋的感情也很美好。

我们总需要一点幻想才活得下去。

我们比起躺在大街上的醉汉和瘾君子，也许只是程度把握得好一点而已。

以为是鲁滨逊漂流记，但星期五和希望都没有出现，只有一具奇怪的尸体。

以为是荒岛余生，但曼尼不是知心友人，而是瑞士军刀，无所不能。

以为是荒野生存，但并没有远离城市，丛林臆想而已。

以为是月球，但其实不孤独。

不孤独在于乍见之欢，在于交谈的起始，在于浪漫的演绎，在于内心的丰盈。

这样的渴望驱使人穿透丛林，挣脱荒岛，来到你的窗前。

但是现实如熊口，旁人如深渊。

你只能缩回躯体，唤醒曼尼，于海面上驰骋，直到所有偏见都无法追及。

人终究是感性的动物，心灵满足便是终极追求。

至于方法和手段，无关紧要了。

问题：1. 片头他在哪？

他是如何到这个岛上的？

2. 一共过了多少天？

发展：1. 留难孤岛，寻求自尽2. 飘来尸体，脱离孤岛3. Manny说话，还会唱歌(不记得记忆中的东西->可能是Hank自我臆想)4. Manny开始问问题。

(人们会丢弃破旧的，空闲的，无用的东西，会埋葬死人。

)5. Hank想回到人类社会，回归幸福(两人第一次出现争吵)6. 谈论masterbation和weird。

7. 公交上模拟偶遇8. 发现Manny的诸多特技9. Hank爱上Manny10. 水中亲吻，回到岸边11. 谈论父亲，两人都不善言辞12. 谈论放屁（不可在人前放屁，不自由，还不如现在的自由）13. 看见汽车，有信号，看到Sarah的ins，看到父亲的贺卡14. Manny脑中闪过很多thoughts，两人分裂又复合15. Manny背Hank回到人类社会，为Sarah大打出手。

（Hank内心极度矛盾）16. Hank夺回尸体，众人发现两人的生存足迹，最后回到海边17. Manny回归大海。

我想Manny一直都是一句死尸，最初利用放屁逃离岛屿让Hank心中重新燃起了生的希望，其后的种种“神迹”都是他自己臆想出来的（更准确而言是另一个他做的而他的本体不自知）。

仅仅有生的希望是不能够回去的，他是因为离群索居而离开社会，要想再次回归社会还需要改变自己内心的世界观，换一种态度去生活。

有着特异功能的Manny就充当的Hank的人生导师，让他重新思考爱情（对Sarah）、亲情（对父母亲）、对陌生人（如何相处）、对社会（各种社会禁忌）、对性（女人和自慰）。

思考过程中也会自我矛盾，无所适从。

片尾Hank一方面想见Sarah，一方面又限于尴尬而抗拒。

所以两个人大打出手，也就是Hank自己内心无比纠结。

所谓万事万物在矛盾中发展，情况也是一步一步好转。

Hank由之前的厌世和自卑（上吊自杀），变得开始喜欢自己（亲吻Manny），想象着属于自己的美好（鼓起勇气和Sarah表真心）。

所以一开始Hank背着Manny，最后改成了Manny背着Hank，这就是心里两个小人在不断博弈的外在表现。

“I just wanted to give you all the thingsin life that everyone else gets to haveand all the things I thoughtI didn't deserve to have till I met you.And they might laugh at us.They might call us names,and they might think we're weird,but it doesn't matter what they think.Just please...don't die.”这是Hank终于想明白的道理，其实很简单。

就是这一辈子，只为自己好好活。

Manny在教会Hank后，乘屁远离人类社会，不留一丝云彩。

Hank笑了，他爹笑了，小女孩笑了，我也笑了。

彩蛋：所以不要以为辞职工作去旅行人生就有多大变化。

只要自己的三观不更新，回归生活后一切照旧。

而一般人都没有这么好的运气内化出Manny般的救世主，所以就要看看书呀，听听别人的理解呀来自我修正。

这条路注定走得艰辛，祝你我好运。